Perhaps one of the dirtiest small-time tricks played by Richard Hoagland and perpetuated by Sterling Allan in the immediate aftermath of the despicable murder of Dr. Eugene Mallove (Gene), was to make it sound as if The Universal Appeal (Nov. 16, 2003) for funding and support which Gene had written more than 5 months before his murder was a personal appeal sent by Gene to Hoagland on the eve of being murdered. Even after both Hoagland and Allan were corrected on this by C. Frazier, formerly IE's Managing Editor, they persisted in not changing the text!

The record indeed is a very different one. Gene spent the afternoon and evening of Thursday, May 13th, writing two letters that capped nearly four months of intense negotiations with two interested parties. These are the last letters written by Gene:

Dear Mr. Sragovicz,

I hope that this letter finds you in good health and good spirits. It was a pleasure to have spoken with you last month about the Correa Project, which was prompted by the connection set up by Herman Branover. I will never forget the many intimate conversations, fine dining, and warm spirits that Herman Branover and I had in the past few months as we discussed the critical need for New Energy. The triumphant highlight was his visit to Toronto to view some of the actual technology. I am so very, very sorry that for whatever reasons we were not able to persuade you to become involved. Still, I want to thank you for having given us the opportunity to present the case for the Correa work to you and to your attorney, Mr. Epstein.

Today I make this sincere request of you. I hope that you will consider making a generous contribution the New Energy Foundation, which supports publication of the Truth about New Energy, and which also provides grants for valuable researchers. I enclose our "Universal Appeal for Support for New Energy," which makes the case for our charitable work. We have both a publishing and a grant-giving function. (...) You should know that $10,000 [of grant money] went to the Correas for some astonishing work on the acceleration of the decay of beta-emitting radioactive isotopes. This certainly bears on the nuclear aspects of "cold fusion," but it could also have application to simple ways to eliminate radioactive waste. Our other grants so far have gone to other cold fusion researchers - Prof. Oriani, Dr. Mitchell Swartz, and to expenses for the upcoming international conference (October-November 2004) on cold fusion, ICCF11. We have been promised other funding for cold fusion researchers by our primary benefactor. However, as you know, the quest for New Energy is far broader than the isolated "cold fusion" field and the needs are great. (...) Whatever you can contribute would be greatly appreciated, and I thank you in advance for considering a contribution to our cause.

Sincerely,

Dr. Eugene F. Mallove
President, New Energy Foundation, Inc.
Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine

How disappointed Gene was with Mr. L. Sragovicz's antics can only be appreciated from the next letter he wrote, to Prof. H. Branover, a letter that makes it explicit. Suffice to say that after Gene's death, Mr. U. Soudak pleaded with Mr. Sragovicz to donate to NEF the pittance which Gene had asked for, but no such generous gesture came forth.

Dear Herman,

I hope that this letter finds you and your dear wife well and in good spirits. I will never forget the many intimate conversations, fine dining, and warm spirits that we have had in the past few months. The triumphant highlight was your visit to Toronto. I am so very, very sorry that it has all seemed to have collapsed in utter failure. This is a deep, deep and profound tragedy for us all - particularly for my 15- year quest to have appropriate New Energy science and technology properly funded and dealt with by the scientific and investment communities. I am very depressed about the outcome, but I shall struggle on. I regret to say that the financial and technical situation with the Correas is far more difficult. They will be moving from Canada, for sure now, given that both Sydney Kimmel and Leon Sragovicz have failed them.

Though I understand that you intend to try to continue to seek financial support for the Correa Project - and I praise you for that good intention- it will be much more difficult, perhaps impossibly difficult, to conceive of any funding initiative that could come in at this late time and change the whole situation. In any case we have decided that we will never again engage in any situation in which the potential investing party does not agree to meet us face-to-face from the very beginning. It is astounding that we never did get to meet either Mr. Kimmel or Mr. Sragovicz! Just to think about the spectacular lack of curiosity and hospitality of these men makes me ill. We are the most informed people in the world about this subject and they care not to meet us to learn what we have to say?!

On May 17th the Correas will be leaving for a brief Florida visit and thereafter to some off-shore non-US island venues where they will be seeking a new kind of lifestyle. After the appalling treatment their brilliant scientific efforts have encountered, I can fully understand their disgust with the totality of the world's financial and other circumstances that has led to this impasse. The amount of money asked for the development of already working devices was a tiny pittance for these wealthy men-certainly a pittance compared to what financial rewards they would have reaped in the end. And not to forget the geopolitical outcome that would have been inevitable with the birth of technologically robust devices. You know that, and I know that.

I have several modest requests of you, which I hope you will be able to fulfill:

1.  The Correas have asked Uri and me to ask you for a written Letter of Recommendation, addressed to the Correas, so that when it is shown to others by the Correas it will be an encouragement for others to explore and perhaps to financially support, in some way, their scientific work. I have long ago given the Correas several such letters, as has Uri, and as has Dr. Aspden. In your letter, you could refer to the assessments that I and Uri have made, to what you saw on your visit to Toronto for discussions and observations of their lab equipment and testing procedures, to your perusal of the articles in Infinite Energy that I have written about the Correas, their patents, the DVD you saw, their books, their art, their knowledge of advanced biology, etc. Anything that you write will be very much appreciated. I hope that you can write such a letter in the near term. It is the least we can do for them, I hope you will agree. Thank you!

2.  Since Leon Sragovicz has given me his mailing address, I am sending him today a sincere request for a tax-deductible contribution to our New Energy Foundation, Inc. (NEF) I hope that you will encourage him to be generous to New Energy Foundation.(...)

3.  For whatever his reasons Sydney Kimmel has decided not to listen to your advice about your findings after your long investigation of the Correa work, facilitated by me and by Uri. But since his mind seems to be focused on the general concept of helping to bring New Energy to the world, perhaps you could persuade him via your own direct request to charitably donate to New Energy Foundation? If I had his address, which I do not have, I would approach him directly. Since he may not wish you to give out his address, I hope that I can count on you to transmit a copy of the attached "Universal Appeal for the Support for New Energy" directly to him along with a statement from you about our needs. Thank you!

4.  Finally, since you are influential in the Lubavitch community- and other Jewish religious communities, I hope that you could find some method of letting those communities know about the work of New Energy Foundation as the leading general publication in the world for this priceless knowledge, as well as our role as a research grant-awarding agency. If you know journalists in some Jewish publications who would wish to interview me and do a story about New Energy Foundation, the significance of cold fusion, etc., I would really appreciate being referred to them. Thank you for this also!

Of course we were all so very, very disappointed-as you were-that Leon Sragovicz, who had such good intentions toward the Correa Project, decided not to stand up as an independent person and make up his own mind based on what you, I, and Uri told him. Instead, he took the advice of his attorney Gary Epstein, who has no basis whatsoever for judging the technical merit-or any other merit-of the Correa project. Epstein's suggestion that we should approach venture capitalists was an ignorant and insulting statement, for reasons that we all know. This is one of the most preposterous results of a lengthy, sincere, and very difficult (and expensive for us in time and money) solicitation for scientific development funding that I have ever encountered. I hope that the sting of this result will be somewhat modified by good deeds toward NEF from Sragovicz and Kimmel - and perhaps from others. Perhaps by giving charitably, they may be less concerned about their investment portfolios and the opinions of attorneys, and more concerned about scientific Truth and the Justice that would come to the world if and when we bring about the much desired New Energy Revolution.

I wish I could say that I am optimistic about the Energetics Technologies efforts succeeding, but I am not. I have no doubt at all the researchers in Israel will do very good scientific work and will be tantalized from time to time about this or that excess heat or heat-after-death result, but I would be quite amazed if in 3, 5, or even ten more years of funding by Sydney Kimmel they will have created a stand- alone 1-kilowatt electric generator from "cold fusion." They have no idea what truly is going in the microcosm of water, metals, and gasses. Since they have committed to Dr. Dardik's preposterous notion that "waves on waves" is the "secret" to cold fusion, I am sad to say that the effort-in its present incarnation- is most likely to fail. I would not have been able to make such a statement three or four years ago, but today I am reasonably confident that I am on solid ground. Over $100 million has already been spent on "cold fusion" research by governments, private individuals, and companies. There is every prospect that another $100 million may be spent, still without getting to the desired goal. This is so very, very sad. It did not have to be that way.

I have my own difficulties to attend to now. I have given generously of my time and resources, but without the influx of adequate and reliable funding for New Energy Foundation, I too will have to impose on myself far less rewarding activities. My initial choice may have to be the real estate sales field, for the truth is that I cannot afford to continue trying to make ends meet on my present low salary- less in real dollars than I was making in 1991. I have done other less scientifically rewarding work before to support the New Energy cause - teaching school and selling computer equipment over the telephone at a local company. Perhaps I will be doing mundane stuff once again.

I look forward to hearing from you. All good wishes,

Dr. Eugene F. Mallove
President, New Energy Foundation, Inc.
Editor-in-Chief, Infinite Energy Magazine

There it is!, the effort which this dear friend was making in his last hours. And when he was done with it, nearly 18:35, he fired these two letters and copies to us on what would turn out to be his last email message he sent us. Early in the morning, he had sent us another message:

Dear Alex and Paulo,

A nice exchange with Alf Thompson! Wonderful.... I still do not rule out some good financial connection coming from that. We shall see.

And I am DELIGHTED to hear about the desalination/cooking ideas you have. These kinds of "normal" items could be "just the thing" to penetrate subversively into the "normal" alternative energy community, which has plenty of money to throw around. Then, like a jack-in-the-box -- you could pop out and inform them that you have much, much better stuff -- PAGD, Aether motors, etc.. I.E. Use the Trojan horse approach. I urge this, in general.

I was heartened by your mentioning to Alf the Aether motor patent approval. When will there be a number assigned? -- the process is usually only a few months, I think. (...)

My objective today will be to fax Branover a polite letter of request for a formal letter of support for you work. I will fax it to him and then send you a copy. In addition to this support letter request, I am going to press him for a means for ME to directly approach Kimmel with a request for funding for NEF - - I asked him to do that long ago. He owes me! In parallel, since I have Sragovich's address, I will be asking for support for NEF from him too -- as I had long ago told Branover I would do. Needless to say, some of this potential largesse -- if rendered -- will go toward funding specific publishable research projects to be carried out by you and Alex, wherever you find yourselves, perhaps with my long-range or occasionally on-site assistance.

Make sure you find a rather idyllic place so that Joanne and I can come and visit from time to time!

Popular Mechanics: I will encourage Jim Wilson to do a story along the lines of your option #1: I will ask that he purchase ALL your stuff, and I will tell him that I plan to carry out a long term education project with him about Aetherometry. This, I would hope, would lead to a series of articles by him with the general rubric: Is Physics Cracked? He would feel free to cite other work - e.g Bearden, Puthoff, or whomever, but I would suggest to him that he acknowledge that YOUR work contains the only known irrefutable prototype technological devices connected with vacuum energy and that the nature of your revolutionary theory is such that it fits the emerging reality in a superior way.

DeMeo: I have been composing a letter to him in my mind for some time now. It is nearing the time when it will be set down on paper. I will send you a copy of it first -- to get some input from you on it. I hope to be able to have something to you by late on May 16th -- but other pressing needs may make that impossible (e.g. The need to go tomorrow to Norwich to put the trash from the previous tenants into a large dumpster), so if I have some way of communicating with you by fax, etc. when you are in F. (at a hotel?), that might work. Let me know your communications coordinates and abilities.

That is all for now.

Oh, one last thought --If there is a chance of your Research Grant work on beta-emitter enhanced decay being advanced enough by October, I would love to introduce a paper by you for ICCF11 in Marseilles. It's your call. I would read its summary during the main plenary session. That is how they handle "posters" -- or, I could press for a 10-20 minute Power Point presentation in one of the sessions devoted to nuclear effects.

All best,

Gene

We tried, Gene, we tried - and well in advance of the deadline. We thought we would deliver a paper on either our on-going work on beta emitters, or some fundamental discovery of Aetherometry with respect to nuclear physics, something that we would have discussed together with you. We also thought that NEF and IE should have an official presence at ICCF-11, but we could interest no one, not even NEF, to either give us the means to attend or to send a representative to the Conference. Even NEF's major benefactor was not interested. Not even in our work on Cold Fusion! That, however, is still another story.

1.2.  Eloquent summary on national radio (Feb. 3, 2004)

The simple answer to the question of what Gene was up in the last years of his life is that Gene had become an aetherometrist. His own words in the last George Noory, late night "Coast to coast" show tell us what he was up to and what his learning had led him to conclude. Here are some select excerpts (minutes are counted from the beginning of the second hour of the show):

GN:  If there were an alien civilization (...) a hundred thousand years ahead of us, what kind of energy sources do you think they would be using?

EM: Vacuum energy, there is no question about it. There is absolutely no doubt, zero doubt in my mind -- and I'm the author of the Starflight Handbook, a mainstream technical popular book on interstellar flight, by the way -- I would say all the proposals that I and Dr. Matloff collected in that book are rather obsolete (...)

GN:  And vacuum-energy is also called space-energy, right?

EM:  Space energy, Aether energy. There is an Aether -- that's the bottom line -- there is an Aether, pervading space. It is not the Aether that was dismissed, properly, the electromagnetic Aether that the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887 --

GN:  Or the kind that puts us to sleep --

EM:  Or the kind that puts us to sleep. There's a pervading massfree energy in all of the Universe -- there's no such thing as a Big Bang, by the way -- a highly questionable theory. (...) Basically, Aether energy is at the root of everything. (...) The Aether is responsible for the creation and destruction of matter, it is responsible for life itself, OK? all particles are made of Aether, they are not little hard things, they are - the things that we call particles today, electrons and protons and so forth - are nothing but special geometries of the massfree Aether that are in a form that makes them have an inertial quality. In other words, makes them have mass. But the largest body of energy in the Universe is definitely the 'vacuum'. The 'vacuum' is where it is. Some people have called the energy, or have interpreted it from Physics' perspectives, as you said, zero-point energy. I don't believe that that theory, the zero-point energy theory, is the proper Aether theory. But it's nonetheless a good starting point. But the bottom line is, there are devices today, on this planet, in laboratories, not in government laboratories, that -- I mean, I don't know whether the government has these things, I doubt that they do, but OK, maybe they have them - but the individuals and research teams working on devices that do not employ hydrogen for anomalous nuclear reactions, but employ nothing but electrical discharges and collections of what Reich had called "orgone energy".

GN:  Mmm hmm

EM:  these things are absolutely real, they have been verified, there is theoretical foundation for them, I have observed these experiments, I attest to them, there is even a new form in the latest issue of our magazine, issue # 53. (...) It's titled "Solar Power by Day and by Night". Now, Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa in Toronto, Canada, have managed to create a special type of what Reich would have called an Orgone Accumulator, but they call it a Hybrid Orgone Accumulator, that sits, around-the- clock, generating power in a small Stirling engine. I worked with them, by the way, to calibrate, to make sure that the experiments are being done properly. They go round-the-clock running a Stirling engine, as though -- as though -- there were a source of 2 watts of thermal energy inside the metal Faraday cage. Now that's vacuum-energy for sure.

GN:  Someone's gonna get a Nobel Prize one day for this.

EM:  Some day, yes.

Gene is quite clear in stating what he knows: that, as far as he knows and can surmise, the solution to the energy problem does not lie about in any government laboratories; that the solution is ultimately one that has already come from engineering the 'vacuum', and more specifically, from an understanding of massfree energy, which he calls Aether. He specifically states that this technology harkens back to the maligned work of Wilhelm Reich - and that he has worked with us in the development of a special variant - the HYBORAC/Stirling thermomechanical technology - which, to date, outputs, day and night, an average 2 watts of sensible heat, with comparable daytime and nighttime output thermal and work performances.

Next, he refers to our patented plasma work on the autogenously pulsed abnormal glow discharge (PAGD):

EM:  [...] There's absolutely no doubt that the devices -- patented devices, no less - by Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa in Canada are over-unity, OK? This is clear a case where vacuum-energy can be seen, in technically published information that is irrefutable, as far as I'm concerned -- and I've personally been at the lab and seen it -- there's no doubt that these machines exist. Now Steve [Greer] would say that the government has much more advanced technology, which they've maybe learned from UFOs or something.

GN:  Right.

EM:  Maybe; but what good does it do us? Is it really doing us any good? No, obviously not. My general feeling about it is that the government does not have such things."

In his usual diplomatic fashion, Gene puts an end to S. Greer's (and SEAS) deluded views about what the US government has and why it has kept it from 'the people' or 'the world'. The reader is also referred to the section on Greer and our candidacy to obtain the nonexistent Z price (coming soon).

Next, Gene proceeds to describe the tribulated history of the concept of an Aether, how the advent of Special Relativity dethroned the old electromagnetic Aether and legated to present-day physics the erroneous notion that Space could exist without energy, independently from it and in its absence:

GN:  Dr. Mallove, let's talk a little bit more, then, about energy category #2, and that is zero-point energy which we touched upon a bit -- space energy. What is it? What's out there that does this?

EM:  Well, here we have to talk about -- just name -- the fundamental theories on which mainstream physicists and chemists rely, (...) for the entire foundation of our scientific world, (...) and these theories are, at present: Quantum Mechanics, OK? --

GN:  Mmm hmmm

EM:  and Relativity, the Special Theory of Relativity -

GN:  Right

EM:  - that changed everyone's perspective, starting around 1920, when Einstein began to become prominent. He had his theory of Special Relativity published in 1905, and later his General Relativity Theory, a theory of how so-called Space-Time is curved in four dimensions, to give gravity and so forth -- you know, there are many reasons why he became very prominent, we need not get into them, but obviously he did become prominent, and the Theory of Relativity is given a lot of credence. And it basically says, as we all know, e = mc^2. That's a simple equation that everyone can understand: that mass times the speed of light squared is the equivalent amount of energy in matter. And we rely on that, generally speaking, for explaining nuclear reactions.

GN:  And there is a lot of energy that comes out of that.

EM:  Oh, absolutely. There is no doubt that nuclear reactions, both fission -- [which] gave us the atomic bomb, the fission bomb -- and then thermonuclear fusion energy...

GN:  Mmm hmmm

EM:  ...from the hydrogen bomb, and the attempts, of course, by the hot-fusion community -- the 20- billion dollar attempts, since 1950 -- to tame it and bring it down into large Tokamak-type reactors. However, it turns out that, after a long consideration by critics -- and there have been many critics of Special Relativity, very sane people, not anti-semites who were against Einstein because he was Jewish, OK? there were those --

GN:  OK, I understand.

EM:  But -- you know, the Nazis called it "Jewish science", for example -- but people who were careful critics of Relativity have not been listened to, OK? and have just been brushed aside, because it was stated that the experiments all confirmed all aspects of Relativity, Special Relativity, and there could be no doubt about it. A guy from Caltech said that, David Goodstein, the same man who said, in recent times, that -- you know -- he really had doubts about cold fusion. OK? So he doesn't know what he's talking about.

GN:  Mmm hmm. Right.

EM:  But it turns out that Relativity is fundamentally flawed. It basically introduced the concept that there was no Aether, OK? -- and it was true that there was no electromagnetic Aether -- this, the Michelson-Morley experiment and some other experiments, in my view, the view of others who I learned from, have proved that there was no Aether whereby electromagnetic waves had to vibrate in space to produce what we see of light and so forth. But this threw out the possibility that there was another kind of Aether, a mass-free Plenum, that did not operate on electromagnetic principles, that the Michelson- Morley experiment could never detect, OK?

Then, boldly and to the utter dismay of most CF/LENR/CANR militants, Gene introduces the listener to Wilhelm Reich (when was the last time that the airwaves were thusly graced?) and the critical 1941 Reich-Einstein experiment - which we reproduced and analyzed in a report that Gene published as an IE feature (IE#37, 2001), and which he, as Editor, considered as important a discovery of a thermal anomaly as the discovery of cold fusion (see the section dedicated to the Reich-Einstein experiment):

GN:  Yes.

EM:  So who is some person like that to say anything about physics?

GN:  Right.

EM:  Well -- [both laugh] -- in 1941, brilliant fellow that he was, he brought some interesting observations to Einstein. He actually had four and a half hours with Einstein -- by the way, this meeting is virtually absent from all accounts of the biography of Einstein.

GN:  Why? Because of what happened to Reich?

EM:  Because Reich was later disparaged -- he died in prison, remember?

GN:  Yeah, [inaudible]

EM:  He was turned into, just like cold fusion, an 'insane pathological man'.

GN:  You think Einstein took some ideas from him?

EM:  No, no, not at all.

GN:  OK.

EM:  Einstein -- he asked professor Einstein -- a colleague, of course, in the fight against fascism -- remember, this was early 1941, before the United States got into the war --

GN:  Right, OK

EM:  Of course, both of them were opposed to the Nazis, obviously -- and --

GN:  And well aware of what was going on

EM:  and well aware of the possibility... So Einstein, to his credit, felt that all possibilities should be explored in the possible quest to find ways to deal with, perhaps, war technology and what have you. You know, his letter[s] later on to President Roosevelt obviously helped the Manhattan Project get going. But here was Reich showing him a simple experiment whereby a mercury thermometer, very accurate mercury thermometer, on the surface of what we call a Faraday cage -- a steel enclosure -- was higher, and remained higher throughout the day, than a similar mercury thermometer suspended in air. OK? Now, this sounds -- your listeners even who don't know about this, may say, well, that sounds crazy; what, what, what could that possibly show?

GN:  Hm.

EM:  Well, careful experiments by Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa in Canada, confirming this type of experiment, and in fact giving it an even worse bias against being seen -- in other words, not having the orgone-accumulating layers of material around the Faraday cage, just using bare steel -- steel boxes, so to speak, in their laboratory, they have found persisting round-the-clock elevated temperatures on the metal Faraday cage, even in a darkened room. Now when I first saw their Aether motors and their PAGD, I was obviously motivated to go back and study Reich. Prior to that, I had no interest in Reich. But I wondered: God, I mean, could Einstein have missed, in 1941, a profound discovery? And the answer is: absolutely yes.

GN:  Yeah

EM:  We covered this in our issue 37. He brought it to Einstein, Einstein confirmed -- I repeat, confirmed -- that there was a three-tenths of a degree or more elevation on the Faraday cage. But his assistant -- Einstein's assistant -- Leopold Infeld, pooh-poohed it; he did some half-baked experiments to suggest that: oh, yes, the simple explanation as to why this elevated temperature is there

GN:  Mm hm

EM:  and he pushed Einstein away from thinking about it, and thus broke the connection, the critical connection, between Einstein and Reich -- which, if it had persisted, and if Einstein had behaved himself, and continued the correspondence -- Reich did write many letters, technical letters, to Einstein, pleading with him to re-evaluate the assertions, the glib assertions, of Leopold Infeld -- much as today, in the late 20th century and early 21st, we are pleading with scientists and political leaders to re-evaluate the absurd, glib dismissal of cold fusion. Well, Einstein never did that. And so Reich went much further with this energy, the manifestation of Aether energy, which initially was this elevated thermal anomaly on a very simple experiment. So, just like Galileo with his experiment of dropping a cannonball and a smaller object from the leaning tower of Pisa

GN:  Mmm hmm, right

EM:  -- [inaudible] a very simple experiment showing simultaneous arrival at the ground, making a profound change in paradigm -- a simple experiment with a thermometer, which I have done myself, by the way, to my own satisfaction, in my own basement, and found the same persisting thermal anomaly, and that's not all: when you elaborate that simple experiment and other experiments that Reich did with electroscopes, gold-leaf electroscopes, you find huge anomalies occurring in Faraday cages. And Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa have in their laboratory done many further experiments to clarify some of the many, many confusions that Reich himself had about this.

In a brilliant piece of scientific journalism, Gene leads the listener from the death of the old, electromagnetic, luminiferous Aether, directly to the work of one of the discoverers of the new massfree Aether, Wilhelm Reich, while putting in confrontation two different scientists and their theories - Einstein's, which had brought about the death of the old Aether, and Reich's, which had initiated a path towards the new understanding of the Aether, or the scientific pursuit of the New Aether.

Then, he directs the listener to the immense technological change opened up by understanding the New Aether - to our work in reproducing Reich's Orgone Motor, in developing it beyond what Reich left it at, in providing a new understanding and engineering of the two fundamental manifestations of this Aether (the electric and the nonelectric), and in demonstrating that a minimum energy of the electric Aether is responsible for the cosmic microwave background - thus invalidating all cosmological Big-Bang theories:

GN:  Would you say that this Aether is a normal occurrence in the Universe, and it's a natural thing?

EM:  It is THE -- it's the foundation of the Universe. There is no other foundation of the Universe. The myth of Relativity -- and Relativity is wrong, it is incorrect -- indeed, its equations describe certain experiments, accelerator experiments, very accurately, there's no doubt about that --

GN:  An outcome, I guess, right?

EM:  but this -- the theory can be wrong, in other words, an equation can give you a very precise match between an experimental result in an accelerator, as an example, and a theory, but that does not mean that the theory is fundamentally correct. In fact it [the relativistic theory in question] is fundamentally, absolutely wrong. There is no such thing as non-simultaneity and so forth, it's all unfortunately a myth. One thing is for sure: if you have a motor that is working, as I've seen in their [the Correas'] laboratory, off an orgone accumulator -- in other words, one wire coming from a Faraday cage, running a motor, through special electronics (patent applied for, [inaudible])

GN:  Mm hmm

EM:  and this motor is running from an orgone accumulator, that is from an Aether accumulator, of latent heat, as they would say -- latent heat from the Aether, as one component of the Aether -- that's it, that ends the whole entire myth of Special Relativity.

GN:  Is there any exhaust coming off this motor?

EM:  No, there's nothing.

GN:  Nothing.

EM:  The only thing that the Correas insist upon, as far as correspondence of one very fundamental law that we are all aware of, the Conservation of Energy law, they are 100% behind the conservation of energy. Their physics is an energy-based physics; Time and Space are subsets of energy. Energy is the primary reality of the Universe. The energetic Aether is the primary reality of the Universe.

And Gene proceeds directly to introducing the listener to the fundamentals of the aetherometric theory of particles. In particular, he makes allusion to the finite-flux toroidal structures that we had showed him - in the manuscript of our upcoming book on nanobiology and in our unpublished work in nuclear physics - and how they have permitted us to resolve the deep structure of nucleons as well as the role of chemical bonds:

GN:  I understand.

EM:  They're open to criticism, they have a website where people can discuss things with them, but I must tell you that they are very definitely in the right, going substantially in the right direction; they are publishing work which is exemplary, pioneering -- I hope some day they are blessed with a reward for it, because up to this point, all they've been rewarded by is abuse; in fact, abuse even by people in the cold fusion field, I regret to say.

GN:  That's interesting.

EM:  Right. It's like a dont -- you know, it's -- even the new-energy field, I regret to say, has had turf wars, and they're stupid, OK?

GN:  Sure. There's politics in everything.

EM:  Right. But -- but Aether, as far as advanced space flight, I will seriously have to revise the Starflight Handbook some day.

GN:  And what does it do in terms of speed, Eugene?

EM:  There's no -- there's no limitation on speed. The myth of "no massfull object could go faster than the speed of light" is just that, it's a myth."

And armed with all he has laid, Gene next draws to a kill on Relativity:

GN:  And, and in that case --

EM:  Hundreds of time faster than the speed of light.

GN:  Then, then you may indeed be a time-traveler.

EM:  No, because the -- there's another myth of Relativity. The Twin Paradox is -- is also a myth, OK? It is just wrong; the time dilation is not part of the Universe, it just isn't. No matter how many times they will tell you about muons changing their decay patterns coming through the atmosphere, and so forth, and this proves, supposedly, time dilation. They can say it as long as they want, but there is no such thing. Time dilation is a myth. (...) Now listen, since there is no such thing as Space-Time, which is this combined entity that came out of Special Relativity, there can be no such thing as a warped Space- Time that gives you black holes, or gives you singularities such as Steven Hawking talks about, or others in cosmology talk about. This has gotten into complete megalomania and insanity, but let me tell you: the joke -- the cosmic joke of all time -- is on 20th -- late 20th century and early 21st century modern physics, because history will record that they went off on a tangent, with Relativity, Special and General, and they completely fooled themselves, at the very same time making fun of such things that were giving them a hint as to the alternate physics -- namely, low-energy nuclear reactions, Aether energy, what Reich came up with. These people ought to go back to Science 101. Science 101 is this: experiment always overrules theory."

Now, Gene comes to the crux of his own politics of energy and his role as president of NEF and Editor of IE, where he must keep an open mind to very diverse forefront research developments:

[6:05]

GN:  Now, are these three categories [cold fusion, Aether energy, ambient energy] an evolutionary stage, or can we just go to the best one and try to work on that?

EM:  Well, I think all three should be pursued. [...]

GN:  And I guess any one of them would be better than what we have right now?

EM:  Oh, of course; it will be free energy. In all cases, it would be free energy. I will draw an analogy for your listeners with the computer revolution, a personal-computer revolution. At one time -- certainly when I was doing my doctoral work at Harvard -- we had to pay for the amount of CPU minutes or hours logged in processing Fortran programs, where you'd give them the card deck, and of course the mainframe computer would click away, and a certain amount of CPU time would -- would click away, and you'd pay for it, your research budget would pay for it. Now we have things sitting on our desks that are constantly computing, even with the screen-saver, say, or some other problem, or database, or any other kind of computer operation, and you're not paying for the CPU minutes that your Pentium or your PowerBook PC is on;

GN:  Mmm hmm

EM:  You are paying for the electricity, but the paradigm of infinite computation in which you do not pay for computer minutes is there. The same thing's gonna happen with energy. That's the ultimate paradigm shift: that there will be no continuing charge for energy. You will ultimately pay, of course, for the device --

GN:  Right.

EM:  you know, for the unit that you put in your house, whether it's with low-energy nuclear reactions, Aether energy,

GN:  Mmm hmm

EM:  environmental energy, whatever it is -- or the new solar energy, as we would say, caused by the Aether, OK?

GN:  But you never have to worry about going and -- and not having your energy available.

EM:  Right, it will be infinite energy, literally -- which is why our magazine is appropriately titled. The establishment mocks that title, Infinite Energy, but that's what energy is: it's infinite, and it should be free, and it is free; life is free, in some sense -- I mean, life takes from the environment things that it needs: air, and water, and, it turns out, Aether energy as well, and that's how life exists, and how life started, OK? Life will eventually return to a -- a system of governance, on this planet and elsewhere in the Universe, that does not depend on constant paying some authority for energy. That era will come -- it can't come soon enough, needless to say. And obviously, your listeners have great imaginations: it doesn't take a genius to realize that the world will be turned completely upside-down when this era arrives. I do not believe it is the evil oil companies holding us back. That is not, in my opinion, what is happening. What is absolutely happening, though, is academic stupidity,

GN:  Mm hmm

EM:  the academic-government complex that started the mythology that only one theory can be correct, Quantum Mechanics is the only thing that can be correct, Relativity is the only thing that can be correct, and just as the MIT professor, may he not rest in peace, Herman Feschbach, who said "I have 50 years of experience in nuclear physics, and I know what's possible and what's impossible" -- that is the standard stance that is in the way of progress, and it prevents, for example, venture capitalists from looking objectively at experiments. They just go to someone else, after you tell them "OK, low-energy nuclear reactions is correct", they go to their favorite physicist and the favorite physicist says: "Oh, I know this is impossible", and of course since he has

GN:  Mm hmm

EM:  PhD's and is with MIT or Caltech or some other place, he's believed, and the outsiders are not believed.

GN:  And the funding stops.

EM:  That's the essence of it, and that's why, my good friends, we need -- for New Energy Foundation, and for many other people, we need the research funds. That's the choke-point. You cannot expect this work to go ahead for free. It won't happen. It just will not happen. And I know that the New Age people and the groupies of -- of many of your other wonderful programs may think that this is just gonna happen by osmosis and the reason it's not happening is because there must be something wrong with the theories and the experiments. Not true. There is nothing wrong with the theories and the experiments. But there is everything wrong with the fact that there isn't enough money in this field, and the new Energy Foundation hopes to change that."

There you have it, his vision for the NEF and his call for help. And he left the scientific establishment with this cautionary thought about our work -

EM:  I will tell you this: the combination of what Tesla did, with Tesla coils and other things, and what Reich did later, the modern Teslas -- namely Dr. Paulo and Alexandra Correa, using that work, and respectfully citing it, very precisely citing it, and writing this up in monographs that can be downloaded from their aetherometry.com website, they have formed what you might call a very precise theory of the Aether; it's not just handwaving, it's equations, it's experiments above all, and it is the legacy that Tesla left us. Some day, Tesla and Reich will be looked upon as some of the most important scientists of all time; whereas right today, of course, they are pooh-poohed completely by the establishment.

—> Next section
Table of Contents